As I watch the last few episodes of Dollhouse, and V and FlashForward go on a lengthy hiatus probably headed toward cancellation, I can’t help lamenting the good/bad state of sf on TV. While most recent sf films are shallow special effects monstrosities, TV sf has been working toward increasing sophistication. One of the best was the predictably canceled Terminator series. All of them achieve a depth of characterization and sf complexity by having an ongoing plot instead of some little weirdness conveniently resolved in 45 minutes or so (minus commercials). The problem with the more sophisticated approach, of course, is that it becomes increasingly difficult to acquire new viewers. No new viewers = cancellation. Perhaps, once that more and more viewers consume their TV via the web this might not be such a problem. If you watch on Hulu, you can pick up a series like Lost from the beginning and ride it on through to the end at any time. From what I’ve seen so far, V probably deserves to die, but no series with a continuous plot line can thrive being absent for months at a time. Reality crap, dozens of CSI and Law & Order clones make it but bore me to tears. Good sf appears, then is gone. Sigh.
Author Archives: Dennis Danvers
Ethel says hello

“The Art Disease” to appear in Electric Velocipede
Electric Velocipede is one of the cooler publications around, and I just got the good news that one of my stories, “The Art Disease,” will appear sometime in the coming year. 2010 is proving to be a good year, and it’s not even here yet.
Till then, here’s the opening—
Derek and Emily had the art disease, the both of them. Everyone they knew had it too. That’s one of the symptoms: Colonies, clusters, movements, splinter groups, manifestos. Clumping, the experts call it. She had a master’s in design and decorated cakes at Food One, not the one on 17th but the one near the park, open till midnight. He refused to sell out. He was determined to support himself with his art.
Selling poems in the park didn’t work out. He didn’t get that many buyers, and when he did, he spent way too much time discussing the poems with them—arguing actually—instead of writing new ones, but it bothered him when he was misunderstood, and it seemed he was doomed to be misunderstood—another symptom of the disease. He tried prose—carefully observed reflections on the vicissitudes of life—after taking a weekend workshop called Driveway Moments: The Eternity of Now. No demand. Light travel pieces with a profound undercurrent proved no better, partly because he hadn’t done much traveling and couldn’t afford to do more. He had plenty of profound undercurrent, just nowhere to put it.
Richmond from Hollywood Cemetery
I love this city.

Revision
I recently had a dispiriting exchange with a former student on Facebook. I’d said something about revision, being in the midst of it, and she commented she’d abandoned fiction after grad school and worked in non-fiction where revision made sense, a process she described as “tuning the language and getting the story correct.” But in fiction, she observed, “what’s to change if the story is just ‘made up’?”
Where did I go wrong? I won’t quibble with “tuning the language” except to ask “to what frequency?” And a quick perusal of Fox News, PBS, and Scientific American might lead to the conclusion that not every true story has the same “correct” for everyone. But this “made up” charge misses the point. All lies are made up, but are all equally effective? You parents are familiar with bad lies and know what I’m talking about. There are teachable, usable skills for telling more effective lies. More importantly, this student is one of my most often quoted to later classes. At the beginning of her workshop, I asked the class to talk about what they considered to be good fiction. I had the usual answers for a while, straight from English classes of yesteryear, but then she said, “It changes your life. When you read a really good novel, it can change your life. That’s what I hope for every time I pick up a new novel—that it will change me.” I would add that whatever magic the fiction may or may not work on the reader, it should work on the writer first. If the book I’m writing isn’t changing me, isn’t making me re-examine myself and my world, I feel like I should be writing a different book. So in answer to the question, “What’s to change?” I’d say yourself and others. Have you created a life-changing experience with words? No? Then revise.
Space and Time #109

I have a new story available in the latest issue of Space and Time. Along with other fine fiction, poetry, and non-fiction. It’s a delightfully weird story. I think y’all should run right out and get a copy. Barnes & Noble has it, btw. Here’s the table of contents:
Fiction:
- Small Motel by Dennis Danvers
- To Remember Riobarre by Alma Alexander
- Love and War by Patrick Lundrigan
- End of Our World as We Know It by Robert Swartwood
- Saving Hitler by Chuck Rothman
- Saint Michael’s Sword by Andrew Alford
- The Mambo King of the Inter-Dimensional Dance Floor by C. J. Henderson
Poetry:
- A Mystic by Candlelight by Tennen Dell
- Al Azif by T. Frazer-Eliot
- Nom de Tube by Carolyn Hawkins
- Pixies by Kristine Ong Muslim
- Hunter’s Moon – Wyoming by John Hayes
- From Tindalos by Wade German
- Dancing in the Room by Kiel Stuart
- When We Come for Us by Ann K. Schwader
Non-Fiction:
- Word Ninja by Linda D. Addison
- Review by Sam Tomaino
Cover Art:
- Ben Fogletto
Sleep Dealer

Readers of The Fourth World are familiar with my interest in the politics of immigration and technology. Sleep Dealer, set in a near-future Mexico, is a brilliant exploration of the theme. While American sf films get worse and worse—witness the recent Star Drek—films like this and the previously mentioned District 9 are being made elsewhere. Why critics must say it’s “disguised as science fiction” when it’s nothing but is due to the American crap that defines the genre in most peoples’ minds so that if it’s worth watching by anyone over 12, it can‘t be sf. If the politics of “illegals” shows up in your town (and where doesn’t it?), or if you’ve ever wondered about that term “American Dream”—see this film.
Inside of a Dog

Inside of a Dog: What Dogs See, Smell, and Know by Alexandra Horowitz is an excellent book for dog lovers who want to understand their dogs better. I was also drawn to the book because I’m revising a novel in which search and rescue dogs figure prominently, and it has been immensely helpful. What Horowitz’s book is not is a book on dog training. I mention this because many of the unfair attacks on the book have come from the dog trainer quarter, not surprisingly since Horowitz discredits the popular macho dominate-your-dog school of dog training based on a misunderstanding of both wolves and dogs. I did a great deal of research on wolves when I wrote Wilderness and have kept up with the subject. It always sets my teeth on edge when people equate dog and wolf behavior and then go on to get wolf behavior all wrong. (If your dog trainer goes on and on about wolf packs and alpha animals, etc., I’d get a new trainer). The book is entertaining and often touching. (I cried at the end—but I’m a big softy). Others have covered this territory, but none so accessibly. I highly recommend it.
The City & The City

When I first read about this book, I was fascinated and eager to read it, but also fearful that I’d be terribly disappointed. I’m very fond of the noir tradition, especially Chandler. (Bright Spot is a more science fictional homage to that genre). I liked many things about Perdido Street Station, but Miéville’s handling of suspense wasn’t one of them. As with the earlier book, the brilliantly imagined city is central to the novel, or in this case two cities. One of the novel’s virtues is the sly exposition of setting, so I won’t spoil it here. It’s quite a good detective novel and so much more. I definitely intend to add it to the Urban Fantasy course I teach each summer. Some might argue this isn’t fantasy at all, and if you like your fantasy laid on with a trowel, this book isn’t for you, but the fact that it seems so real is credit to Miéville’s skill as a writer, and the subtlety of the fantasy. Hat’s off to his impeccable control of his subject. If you let it, this book will make you see the world a little differently, rather like being inside of it, and who can ask for more than that from a novel?
Back from Capclave
I had a good time as usual, though attendance seemed light, probably because of weather. The Morrows were snowed in and couldn’t make it. The Villain panel devolved into a dumb discussion of Hitler and other real world villains without sufficient attention to literary ones. Sheila Williams, editor of Asimov’s was an excellent Editor Guest of Honor. The high point for me was hearing a beautiful short story “Waiting for Jakie” read by Barbara Krasnoff. I was the only one there (except Jim Freund her partner). I don’t know why readings aren’t better attended. I also had one attendee at my reading, and she was an excellent audience, but her name has slipped my porous memory. The best panel I served on was definitely the multiple perspectives topic, with lots of good advice and specifics for writers interested in point of view. It was at 10 pm, however, so the audience was about the size of the panel. SF conventions with my post-heart attack diet are a challenge. There was only one thing on the Hilton menu I could eat, and of course sugar and fat were on offer for free everywhere.